Whatsoever is NLP.
If the number of requirements to see the words "GLP" in the search engines, subsequently you will detain that the immense gaze in the NLP is symbolic high. Nonetheless, it is masses lucid. Outdo, the NLP to date the greatest extent systematic and greatest extent of the unanimous task breadth of psychology. And secondly, above momentously, NLP is not so biased, as a good deal areas of psychological appendage to analysis, and has a number of technologies alert on applications in firm and everyday communication, management, sales, exposure, marketing and a good deal forms of communication, which is used psychological upshot.
To begin with, the NLP model arose as a product of the trauma, the greatest extent successful in producing change in the minds of patients. Milton Eriksson, author and initiator eriksonovskogo hypnosis, is as well contrived, and this explains the go of a be more or less set of these technologies. Nonetheless, if eriksonovsky hypnosis, is the technology to tolerate out the changes in accomplishment, the NLP, a system that combines a picture of being technologies consistent alias language that allows to work with a set of technologies, such as the one.
And, if you look at the NLP from the scientific side, the greatest extent assured definition for it would be "epistemology" - the science of how we appreciate and how to learn. And if you look to the upbeat side, the certain definition of NLP is accessible in its very name - neuro-linguistic programming, ie, Language mental processes by transmit of natter.
Nonetheless, get in the way of natter by "dated draw near to as in a moment as NLP has to use all channels of object and nonverbal communication. But, as a form, the word "GLP has or else demanding place.
Some time ago all of the self-important, I think, undeniably razor-sharp, NLP and hypnosis, involving a good deal guarantee, as well, and give an bright way for make use of - that is, cooperation of drawn or hidden psychological upshot on the accomplishment of a person or the persons tons. And now, I think, to seat to a good deal the conversation about NLP and hypnosis, it is notable to assembly with the question of make use of.
Step arrangement.
I would like to relation your attention to a expansive thoughts that make use of is bad. Step arrangement, it is really bad, but only if you can not confidence expenses for what you are accomplishment. In the same way as in reality, make use of is that we perpetually do with each a good deal, such as the talk.
Now explain podbronee.
Chitchat, people perpetually, and as a rule, on impulse, seek to cause from the a good deal person is a advice, ranging from a simple attention, completing with the prolonged applause, fall in with, or in any cure. From this time, any communication, unless it is 100% submissive, it will be make use of.
So if you be the owner of any goals allied with a good deal people (and this is the goal, which you can not seamless deserted - draw near to all of the goals of current social position), subsequently talking with them, you will be the owner of to place them. It totally will not seamless its goals.
We are everlastingly place one in mint condition, by design or on impulse that happens, it does not matter. And lob the awfully, that this does not toss, subsequently spihivat expenses.
One above commerce. Overt or underground make use of will be - has no elite meaning, in the same way as before every action, slip or word, the interlocutor to say what the advice from him, we want to get it started, would be inane. And at the awfully time, from the fact that you first tell the person what you want from him, and subsequently do no matter which to get it, it does not complete to be a make use of. Immediately it will be open make use of, that's all.
So let us just understand yourself (if we be the owner of not yet done so;)) that we place each a good deal, and totally decide on over expenses for their measures. This will be at lowest honest.
Standards manipulations.
If it happens that such as we communicate, we can not give or take each a good deal, subsequently as now to be? I mean, if I still manipulated, how do I do that it was not bad for others?
The conclusion is very simple, and is recognized here the centuries: do to others as would like to see others come to you.
... Stop! This does not mean that it is central to infringe all that want to own;) All people are being, and all of its goals, values and desires. From this time, the get-together of well-matched communication (or environmentally friendly make use of), it is respect for others' goals, values and interests.
To do this, just think for a second: "And I would be on his (her) place like this would effect me?". And yet, and you get the conclusion to the question, Does your genuine make use of, or, above totally, whether you do well with this person in this situation. The primitive commerce is to be honest with himself, asking the question. Previously it makes no argue.
Systemic luggage.
1. If you communicate with people and at lowest meet the negligible (not to say the activity), you or else be the owner of an upshot. Any information influences.
2. In the same way as you close to any goals allied with a good deal people, you can not not place them (whether blatantly or in a roundabout way). Feature that the goal is for all (in the same way as the want is for all of nature), each of us has to place each a good deal, and accomplishment so efficiently for example shock.
3. Step arrangement becomes wantonness such as a person does not decide on expenses for his measures.
Of these theses rationally follows the of the essence, to whom I teach:
You can do whatsoever, provided that you confidence expenses for their measures.
I understand that the phrase "whatsoever" concentration mine some do not agree: "Wait-ka, but what about morality? But what about society's values?" I understand this grouping, but I pressure on divide expenses noticeably of social values. The point is that we live in a very fragmented society (the awfully is as well pronged by social class), somewhere close home-produced profuse being cultures that stimulate being and sometimes absence values. And if the values of high order (the first three or four), we can above or less the awfully, all the rest will be the owner of general, flat involving people of one society. Just in the same way as each of us belongs to clear companies at whilst and has its own system of values. And do not come with "persons" kingdom position, seeking their "persons" values, it is equally dazed. (These rakes, by the way, and limp greatest extent of the propose conflicts of nature.) From this time, morality based on the values of our racially fragmented society totally does not work - heaps of the freezing experience of perfunctory. That is why I am talking about personal expenses.
And subsequently donate is a great question. And what if I do not decide on expenses for their measures and will do all that I want? Or minute to it: "Yes figs with it with expenses, who knows? Who asks? Who ?!... Yes I subsequently...!".
And at hand we come to the of the essence that condition be understood in a matter of make use of.
Systemic luggage.
The fact that any action will be the owner of value (question what?), Supposed by all. But the fact that this rule applies to each of our action, unfortunately, people do not perpetually commit to memory.
And it is this: thanked generation for try accolade, it was a source of pleasure and he expressed in a conversation in the smoking, that you are "a guy" and by mistake raised your "top". And such as the part began to assembly with all persons of peredovikov vouchers to sponsor, the above you like greased lightning nominated.
Or thank a be involved with for the awfully accolade, and somewhere you had to stay behind for "luck", it totally has not happened.
Similarly, you can place it with anybody just to identify out of respect for another's point of view, and subsequently he would determined with you such as you're presenting your exclusive a new project.
In NLP these "value" are called - systemic luggage (such as human associations is seen as the associations of the elements of a system). Lifeless dazed to count them, but to impel or brand the sheer route - is masses real. And I think it is lucid why we foster above beneficial systemic luggage of positive and less harmful. I think a razor-sharp example of how this can be done;)
But that's not all. Row has a heart to go to in grassroots minds and in persons records, such as meetings, letters, publications, etc. And the silt, it becomes self-sustaining. Conclusion with the situation: "Thoroughly yes unless he possibly will say this? I appreciate its a long time, it is not his style."? Hardheaded recording for forcing people to procure in what they are regular to and will seat to support this thoughts. That is the nature of human thinking.
In the words of Mikhail Romanovich Ginsburg (an expert and my teacher for Eriksonovskomu hypnosis): "Outdo, you're machinist on zachetku, subsequently zachetka works for you."
Therefore, foliage that systemic luggage of our gust hand baggage may come to us today, and may go to donate and auknutsya five living. And if we want to get an effect as in a moment as voluntary, totally earlier and above "to suffer zachetku. On the other hand, if we do not want to get this effect.
Nonetheless, commit to memory that one action of systemic luggage may be clear. And creating some luggage, "the dilemma" can we get above and above. So, before embarking on vysluzhivanie can suggest consume with the exclusive and indistinct generation. The image of a successful pass - consume with a improve for leadership, zavict less successful, but no less determined generation. Gorgeous attention to the payer together with its orientation and high service wishes, and flat price.
From this time, in order to decide on into invoice the lid voluntary effect, is to do two things:
1. Up the position of person (or group) to which the communication, and from his position to watch, whether it is thorough with communication at this time, in this place, and in this situation?
2. Up the position of all a good deal parties of communication, and see whether all will make it in this situation?
But, the question arises, make unequivocal that does not mine disadvantageous luggage, in profuse hand baggage totally impossible? For example, whilst you become rich, dozens of people are birth to covetousness you. Or, if you be the owner of any competitors in the firm, subsequently attracting exposure to a payer, you are inadequate of their competitors. Is it not so?
Yes. So. And at hand is a good time to commit to memory the rupture of expenses. One commerce is, someone's vexation about your success, and in mint condition - someone's discontented in bearing of your success.
In a good deal words, if your success is achieved by the fact that anybody is unbeneficial no matter which, do not get whatsoever beneficial in think - this is not successful, and stealing. (Do not buy fish from Aromatic plant, it was his thin than me.
And if you seamless success with the rival movement (which would be the owner of rigid), subsequently this is a right success. (If you buy fish from me, I show you how your payer will give a unique pills taiga uhi, get me to be innate from the grandfather - an expert on fish. Or, for example we are talking about make use of - make use of honest.
But as it relates to systemic effects? More readily simple. Find again the law of communicating vessels? To one cruiser from the tube was transferred to in mint condition, you need to, involving a good deal things, and yet that of in mint condition cruiser of the air inspired in first. Previously, the difference in sway just will not let tube.
(No, with a slam into, of plan, you can do no matter which, but hope what it is to influence the "push" And it subsequently "exertion"!
So, this is just one of the laws and system of communication. In communication it is dazed that it was not giving whatsoever in think, and, unusually adequate, go is dazed to give without welcome whatsoever for it. The only question is that - what?
The strategy of "win-win."
Why slam into people to do no matter which such as you can just call it a force for this? It is razor-sharp that to make easier, but with this and afar above. Conceivably not immediately, but in the appearance. (If you do not understand why the above indispensable, read the one-time two paragraphs.
Nonetheless, such as a man in the hands of a pistol, a collar group, and the timer count down the very last allotted time, I can understand his shuffle to slam into anybody to do no matter which. But if it's just a family conversation, or a positive machinist situation?
In any relationship, donate is perpetually a vowel whisper from a meeting. (And if not absolve). And if one person has rigid to do no matter which for in mint condition, it is from this that it receives.
And I will say at whilst, care is not the coat, in the same way as the very idea of "to be unselfish is or else breakfront.
And if anybody is accomplishment no matter which being "for so", he himself, or keep cold to do so, or useful, or he does it all not just for so. "
And at hand, masses acceptably, that profuse people (and individually included) be the owner of a immediate source of pleasure in making a good deal contributions. It seems that the selfless?
So, the strategy of "win-win" is that we do not slam into people to think, what benefits it receives from the fact that to do what we need, but "the benefits of its own and totally furnish them to him consume with a find out or meeting. Conclusion example: "Glass of something with prawns want?" Now I'll give wake, but you go? "
Riotously the awfully pattern is popular in some companies, a strategy "protalkivaniya" of his project: "Critical, you are on a week filed a class idea, I fashion a way to implement it...".
In firm strategy of "win-win" - is the net sales. Any less professional marketer knows that people do not buy the yield and benefits that it brings them. From this time, the shape scheme of selling starts with identifying payer needs, or quantity the use of the yield, that is the awfully.
As you can see, "win-win", is as well a make use of. And, sometimes, in very large price. Nonetheless, make use of, we necessity glance right. And I will not ask you why.
0 comments:
Post a Comment